spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
- radionortheast
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 1:38 pm
spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
just wondering what these figures mean spurious harmonic rejection harmonics: 50db, spurious: -50dbc
i’ve just abit confused does mean it will put out carriers close to the carrier? not something out of the fm band? higher figure must be more desirable, i've often seen figures quoted with transmitters but no explanation.
i’ve just abit confused does mean it will put out carriers close to the carrier? not something out of the fm band? higher figure must be more desirable, i've often seen figures quoted with transmitters but no explanation.
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
It's quite simple. The wanted carrier is set to the top of the analyser screen. Other outputs should be much lower. There will usually be some products at twice and three times the wanted output frequency, but they should be very small compared to the carrier. You want a minimum of -60dBc (decibels referenced against the carrier level). The harmonics should be at least 1000 times (-60 dBc) smaller than the wanted carrier. If your transmitter is 1 Watt output, the harmonics should be a milliwatt or so.
Spurs and noise around the carrier should be even lower - a spec. that I get with my driver boards (when they're installed into their cases) has no in-band product greater than the "grass" level at the bottom of the analyser trace - around -96 dBc. This is exceptionally good. Most commercial rigs will be (typically) around -80 to -90 dBc.
One infamous attempt at simplifying an NRG PLL Pro III board (by cutting out the balancing circuitry in the oscillator and missing out lots of "unnecessary" supply filter capacitors) produced almost as much ½f as the wanted output. The sub-harmonic was only 12dB below the carrier level. The idiot also tried to make the amplifier stages "broadband" by over-driving one into the next - this gave rise to lots of spurs and harmonics. The "Easytune 3" actually produced more unwanted signals than it produced wanted carrier!
Take a look at some commercial equipment specifications and you'll soon see how they work (and which ones can be trusted!).
Never believe any antenna gain that's quoted in "dBi" - that's related to an "isotropic" radiator (which doesn't actually exist). A simple dipole has a notional "gain" of 2.15dBi - obvious nonsense - but you'll see people inflating their gain figures by quoting dBi (Paul Hollings always does this in an effort to make his aerials look "better").
Spurs and noise around the carrier should be even lower - a spec. that I get with my driver boards (when they're installed into their cases) has no in-band product greater than the "grass" level at the bottom of the analyser trace - around -96 dBc. This is exceptionally good. Most commercial rigs will be (typically) around -80 to -90 dBc.
One infamous attempt at simplifying an NRG PLL Pro III board (by cutting out the balancing circuitry in the oscillator and missing out lots of "unnecessary" supply filter capacitors) produced almost as much ½f as the wanted output. The sub-harmonic was only 12dB below the carrier level. The idiot also tried to make the amplifier stages "broadband" by over-driving one into the next - this gave rise to lots of spurs and harmonics. The "Easytune 3" actually produced more unwanted signals than it produced wanted carrier!
Take a look at some commercial equipment specifications and you'll soon see how they work (and which ones can be trusted!).
Never believe any antenna gain that's quoted in "dBi" - that's related to an "isotropic" radiator (which doesn't actually exist). A simple dipole has a notional "gain" of 2.15dBi - obvious nonsense - but you'll see people inflating their gain figures by quoting dBi (Paul Hollings always does this in an effort to make his aerials look "better").
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
- thewisepranker
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:53 pm
- Location: Brighton
-
- no manz can test innit
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:49 pm
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
Beat me to it wisepranker!
I don't see anything wrong with quoting dBi figures. Equally if they want to quote relative to dipole, specify it as dBD to avoid ambiguity. Nothing wrong with either and people dealing with this stuff should understand the difference.
Personally I prefer dBi - seems more scientific/precise to me than relating a given gain to an "arbitary" antenna. Why not dBY (dB relative to a Yagi)?!!
I don't see anything wrong with quoting dBi figures. Equally if they want to quote relative to dipole, specify it as dBD to avoid ambiguity. Nothing wrong with either and people dealing with this stuff should understand the difference.
Personally I prefer dBi - seems more scientific/precise to me than relating a given gain to an "arbitary" antenna. Why not dBY (dB relative to a Yagi)?!!
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
Depends if you're talking Voltage or power!thewisepranker wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:46 am-60 dBc is 1,000,000 times smaller than the carrier.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
dBi is just used to inflate antenna gain figures. Remember - most consumers are technically naive!NOYB wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:36 am Beat me to it wisepranker!
I don't see anything wrong with quoting dBi figures. Equally if they want to quote relative to dipole, specify it as dBD to avoid ambiguity. Nothing wrong with either and people dealing with this stuff should understand the difference.
Personally I prefer dBi - seems more scientific/precise to me than relating a given gain to an "arbitary" antenna. Why not dBY (dB relative to a Yagi)?!!
dBD is a fair measure - a dipole can actually exist, and can be used for comparison. I had a customer recently who couldn't understand that an aerial could actually give (omnidirectional) gain. To persuade him to part with some money for a two-slot colinear, we set up the aerial we were offering and a dipole. Both were bolted to poles on the top of his studio building. We demonstrated using a little 5 watt driver, and his own receiver that had a field strength meter. He was astonished to see the difference in field strength between to two aerials, and he bought the colinear as it was a "cheap amplifier"!
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
Incidentally - my latest valved PA produces 750 Watts RF out on the intended carrier frequency, and just 40mW of second harmonic! I'm quite pleased with that.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
- thewisepranker
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:53 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
dBc is exclusive to power ratios to avoid this confusion.Albert H wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 9:07 pmDepends if you're talking Voltage or power!thewisepranker wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:46 am-60 dBc is 1,000,000 times smaller than the carrier.
40 mW of 2nd harmonic with a 750 W carrier is -42.73 dBc.
-
- no manz can test innit
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:49 pm
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
On my Anritsu and HP spectrum analysers and on my Schlumberger Stabilock Radio Test Set! All receive and log spurs and harmonics as voltage peaks. These are then translated to power (if you want) into a known load impedance by the software in the test gear!
Voltage ratios are actually useful when you're doing the maths to design filters and combiners.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
- thewisepranker
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:53 pm
- Location: Brighton
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
Well yes but not at an absolute value. A calibration table will be essential because your instrument front end isn't flat, although they would love for you to think that it is.
With that logic, your "750 W of forward power" is actually a real measurement around 39 uA on your moving coil meter... Can I have a 14.66 uA rig please?
With that logic, your "750 W of forward power" is actually a real measurement around 39 uA on your moving coil meter... Can I have a 14.66 uA rig please?
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2784
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: spurious and harmonic rejection anyone know about this?
Pranker - you're right of course. Interestingly, the Anritsu is reasonably flay up to a bit over 1 GHz, then all sorts of bizarre "fiddle factors" have to come into play. The Schlumberger 4031 only goes up to 1 GHz, and has the most complicated compensation circuitry I've ever seen in anything! Again, it's pretty flat, but has some peculiarities at the low end.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
-
- no manz can test innit
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:49 pm